Which of these actions would NOT be considered criminal damage to property?

The action that would not be considered criminal damage to property is accidentally causing a spill on a friend’s carpet. Criminal damage typically involves intentional or reckless actions that lead to the destruction or defacement of another person's property.

In this case, the spill on the carpet occurred accidentally, indicating that there was no intent to cause damage or a lack of care that would lead to it. Criminal law generally requires a mens rea, or guilty mind, which involves intent or criminal negligence, to establish that a crime occurred. Since the action was not purposeful and was rather an accident, it does not meet the criteria for criminal damage.

The other scenarios all involve deliberate actions that result in damage to property. Intentionally breaking a window and spray painting a wall without permission demonstrate a clear intent to damage someone else's possessions, while punching a hole in a wall reflects a reckless act that clearly results in property damage. Therefore, the accidental nature of the spill is what distinguishes it from the other actions listed, making it the correct answer.