What additional proof must be shown for a charge of theft by receiving stolen property?

The correct answer highlights the necessity of demonstrating an intention to restore the stolen item to its rightful owner when facing a charge of theft by receiving stolen property. This additional proof is crucial because it establishes the defendant's mindset and can differentiate between merely possessing stolen items and engaging in conduct that seeks to return the property to its lawful owner.

In cases of theft by receiving, the prosecution must show that the individual had not only received the stolen property but also had the requisite intent regarding it. The intent to restore signifies a recognition that the item was wrongfully taken from the original owner, indicating a lack of intent to permanently deprive the owner of their property. This aspect is important in establishing whether the accused is guilty of theft or if they had intentions of rectifying the theft by returning the item.

Other options, such as proving that the person had an intent to keep the items for personal use, would suggest a willingness to permanently deprive the original owner of the property, which is contrary to the defense of this charge. Similarly, claiming that the property was received without knowledge of being stolen does not effectively address the specific nature of theft by receiving since the crime itself hinges on the act of receiving stolen goods, often with a degree of awareness or complicity in the